[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [naoya@matsulab.is.titech.ac.jp: about the tech report on Jimple]



At Tue, 02 Oct 2001 03:30:10 +0900,
Naoya Maruyama <naoya@matsulab.is.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks Etienne. And I have one more question.
> 
> I'm interested in some intermediate language of bytecode
> that satisfies SSA form. The figure 9 in the paper 
> mentioned below shows that the code of the step 4 of
> translating to Jimple actually satisfies SSA form.
> But in the final generated code (i.e., figure 10),
> it doesn't have the property of SSA form. So, is it
> possible that we stop the translation at the step 4 
> (i.e., omit the compaction), and manipulate the generated

Sorry, omit packing of the local vars.

Naoya Maruyama
Tokyo Institute of Technology