Re: run() and InvokeGraph

[Feng QIAN <fqian@sable.mcgill.ca>]

I did not see any drawbacks, but keep this knowledge at the user level may
also be an option.

Cheers,
Feng
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Feng Qian                                       fqian@sable.mcgill.ca
Sable Research Group                       http://www.sable.mcgill.ca
School of Computer Science, McGill University        Montreal, Canada

On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Eric Bodden wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Today I realized that method invocations and so on in the run() mtheod
> of a class extending Thread (or implementing Runnable) are not resolved
> if the InvokeGraph is queried for callees of "start()". But since both
> refer actually to the same method, I think the invokegraph should handle
> queries for run() and start() in the same way. Or are there any
> drawbacks of such a behaviour? I cannot imagine any...
>
> Eric
>
> --------------------------------
> Eric Bodden
> University of Kent at Canterbury
>
>