[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bytecode generation

To: Stephen Cheng <scheng@clear.net.nz>
Subject: Re: Bytecode generation
From: Patrick LAM <plam@sable.mcgill.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 23:43:59 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Soot <soot-list@sable.mcgill.ca>
In-reply-to: <MFEHKCABJDFCMAIGKEOOIEJNCFAA.scheng@clear.net.nz>
Sender: owner-soot-list@sable.mcgill.ca

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Stephen Cheng wrote:

> I am attempting to understand how JasminClass generates bytecode from the
> Jimple IR representation of a method. I have been reading the papers
> Sable-paper-2000-1 and sable-paper-1999-1. However it would appear that the
> bytecode generation algorithm has substantially changed since the
> publication of these papers. Sable-paper-2000-1 talks about Baf and Grimp
> approaches, neither of which seems to be implemented in the current version
> of Soot.

I don't believe that bytecode generation has changed at all since the CC
paper.  Bytecode generation proceeds from Jimple through either Baf or
Grimp to Jasmin.

pat

References:
- Bytecode generation
  - From: Stephen Cheng <scheng@clear.net.nz>

Prev by Date: Bytecode generation
Next by Date: Class names in Soot
Previous by thread: Bytecode generation
Next by thread: Re: Bytecode generation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread