Re: implementation dependent bytecodes

[Chris Pickett <chris.pickett@mail.mcgill.ca>]

Okay, I can do so, I was just looking for the easiest solution for
now.  But if Soot doesn't already support the impdep1/impdep2 bytecodes
then it probably _is_ easiest to use attributes.

Cheers,
Chris

P.S.  Etienne, the bytecode specifications I just sent you are still
valid, but they would get inserted only as a result of reading
attributes.

P.P.S.  I don't care about other VM's because SableVM is the best!!! 
(j/k -- your point makes sense)

Prof. Etienne M. Gagnon wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 10:22:04AM -0500, Chris Pickett wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to use Soot to insert impdep1 (254) and impdep2 (255) bytecodes 
> > into a class file for use by SableVM.
> >   
>
> Doing so would create class files which cannot run on any other VM.
> Is that really what you want?  Why not generate a custom attribute,
> instead?  I think Soot already has the necessary framework to generate
> custom attributes.
>
> Etienne