Re: Soot 2.0.0 info request

[Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>]

Stephen Cheng <scheng@clear.net.nz> wrote:
> >- SSA-Jimple. Really, this time.
> Have the optimisations converted to use Jimple-SSA?

Nope, not yet anyway.  

Note that Shimple (SSA-Jimple/Jimple-SSA) is still dependent on
Jimple: ie Shimple is built from Jimple and when you go out of SSA
form, you get Jimple back.  

The old optimizations are still as they were but many of them can be
applied to Shimple as is, since the only difference between Shimple
and Jimple is that Shimple has Phi nodes.

Volunteers to port optimizations welcome, once it's released.

Cheers,
Navin.