[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Constructing Call graphs without java.* classes

To: Cleidson Ronald Botelho de Souza <cdesouza@ics.uci.edu>, soot-list@sable.mcgill.ca
Subject: Re: Constructing Call graphs without java.* classes
From: Chris Pickett <chris.pickett@mail.mcgill.ca>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:15:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <4037A178.2010309@ics.uci.edu>
References: <4037A178.2010309@ics.uci.edu>
Sender: owner-soot-list@sable.mcgill.ca
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Cleidson Ronald Botelho de Souza wrote:

I've tried several different set of parameters, including "-x java" as explained in the manual, but nothing seems to work. According to the manual, I should NOT need this, because those classes were not supposed to be included in the call-graph.

Any ideas?

I don't know the answer if this doesn't work, but ... did you try "-x java." instead of "-x java"?

Cheers,
Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Constructing Call graphs without java.* classes
  - From: Cleidson Ronald Botelho De Souza <cdesouza@ics.uci.edu>

References:
- Constructing Call graphs without java.* classes
  - From: Cleidson Ronald Botelho de Souza <cdesouza@ics.uci.edu>

Prev by Date: Constructing Call graphs without java.* classes
Next by Date: Re: Constructing Call graphs without java.* classes
Previous by thread: Constructing Call graphs without java.* classes
Next by thread: Re: Constructing Call graphs without java.* classes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread