Re: devirtualization

[Mark Panahi <mpanahi@yahoo.com>]

Thanks for the advice.

I tried the two approaches: inlining and static method
binding. Inlining seems to work fine but smb gives me a
class cast exception. Any ideas?

-Mark

--- Feng Qian <feng.qian@mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> It depends on what did you turn off. You'd better not
> turn of phase 
> options under the name of 'jb' (jimple body creation),
> and only play with optimization phases, such as jop, and
> wjop. 
> Devirtualization is performed in wjop either using static
> method binder 
> or static inliner.
> 
> Cheers,
> Feng
> 
> Mark Panahi wrote:
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> >I am interested in using Soot for devirtualization and
> >measure its effects in isolation of any other
> >optimizations. Is there any way to conveniently turn off
> >all other optimizations and features without having to
> >disable them one-by-one. (And even if I do try to turn
> off
> >certain features, it causes Soot to crash.)
> >
> >Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> >http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
> >  
> >


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools