Re: [abc] abc release

> I did not apply any AspectJ versions, just tracematches.

I think AspectJ numbers would be very interesting, and easy to obtain?
It's especially interesting for your work, since there is no chance
of applying these static analyses to improve the AspectJ version.
So you could make the point that a hand-coded aspect is sometimes
(or even often?) slower than a mechanically optimised tracematch.

The gold standard failsafe iter aspect is in cvs.

> We should
> talk about our journal paper again, shortly. When Julian is done with
> the ITD stuff (which I am very much looking forward to) then I think
> it's about time to wrap all this up with some common benchmark runs.

Hm, the time for a journal paper is when the work has reached some
stability. I don't see that yet, there's still tons to do.

> This should just work. Threads are no issue there because we do not
> take control flow into account.

Thanks, we'll see what that throws up.

Cheers,

-O
Received on Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:06:07 BST