I just wanted to let you know that on our side everything is ready for
a release (i.e. I made sure that everything builds and passes our
tests and all the docs are reasonably up-to-date). So whenever you are
ready for a joint release, please let me know.
Eric
On 25/07/07, Eric Bodden <eric.bodden_at_mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> On 25/07/07, Oege de Moor <Oege.de.Moor_at_comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> > > I did not apply any AspectJ versions, just tracematches.
> >
> > I think AspectJ numbers would be very interesting, and easy to obtain?
> > It's especially interesting for your work, since there is no chance
> > of applying these static analyses to improve the AspectJ version.
> > So you could make the point that a hand-coded aspect is sometimes
> > (or even often?) slower than a mechanically optimised tracematch.
> >
> > The gold standard failsafe iter aspect is in cvs.
>
> Yes, you are right (and I now remember you told me before). I should
> definitely do that for our camera ready copy / next submission.
>
> > Hm, the time for a journal paper is when the work has reached some
> > stability. I don't see that yet, there's still tons to do.
>
> Ok, fair enough.
>
> > Thanks, we'll see what that throws up.
>
> Great. Let me know how it does.
>
> Eric
>
> --
> Eric Bodden
> Sable Research Group
> McGill University, Montréal, Canada
>
-- Eric Bodden Sable Research Group McGill University, Montréal, CanadaReceived on Wed Jul 25 2007 - 22:50:24 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 26 2007 - 03:10:09 BST